Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Editor's Pick

Cooper v. United States Brief: Terry Frisks Are Unconstitutional

Clark Neily

police

One of the US Supreme Court’s most significant Fourth Amendment cases was 1968’s Terry v. Ohio. In Terry, the court held that a police officer can frisk people based on reasonable suspicion that they are involved in a crime and have a weapon. Petitioner Nathan Cooper was subjected to a Terry frisk in January 2022 after reports that he was involved in a dispute at his Florida workplace. He is asking the Supreme Court to revisit the Terry decision

Cato filed an amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to grant the petition and end the practice of Terry frisks. Under the common law and at the time of the American Founding, a Terry frisk would have qualified as the seizure of a person. But a person could only lawfully be seized based on probable cause—a higher standard than reasonable suspicion.

Overruling Terry’s authorization of frisks would be a long-overdue course correction that would strengthen the legitimacy of the Supreme Court’s originalist approach to law.

The court should grant Cooper’s petition and restore a critical protection enacted by the people Justice Scalia once referred to as the “fiercely proud men who adopted our Fourth Amendment.”

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

In this StockCharts TV video, Mary Ellen reviews the broader markets after last week’s rate-cut induced rally. She also shares stocks that are breaking out...

World News

When our ruling classes speak of “believing in democracy,” they are speaking of a romantic version of a form of governance that, in real...

Editor's Pick

Adam N. Michel Tax policy has taken on an outsized role in this year’s presidential campaign and was mentioned repeatedly in the recent presidential...

Editor's Pick

David J. Bier New numbers from the Census Bureau’s mini-census, the American Community Survey (ACS), show that the immigrant population is increasing but is...